Minggu, 05 Juli 2015

active-passive english

Nama : Sarah mutiara dewi
NPM : 1a214034
Nama: Erica Gusti Devianawati
Kelas :1Ea01
Aktive
  1. Indonesian  lows protecting labor
  2. olga sign employment contracts
  3. 3.i have been hired PT Astra outsourcing employee
  4. `In Lombok island PT. Ciputra has benn more provides
  5. PT. Astra decrease its investment
  6. company are  supply medicines
  7. my uncle pay property tax
  8. 8.i follow the campus organizations
  9. 9.manager give me some jobs
  10. my father open a restaurant business
Passive :
  1. Karina fired by the company
  2. The human resource manager said that my documents were skill being processed
  3. The work will have been completed by my father tomorrow
  4. Employee salary increased by the company
  5. Business cake shop opened by my mother
  6. Tax be paid by my mother
  7. In the school the organization is followed by her
  8. Regulation in the school was violated by him
  9. Warranty health to consumen provided by insurance company
  10. Foods for supply had by me

indonesia to english










Nama: Erica Gusti Devianawati (13214599)
  Sarah Mutiara Dewi (1a214034)
Kelas: 1ea01












MANAGEMENT REVIEW K3 (OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY
Management Review focuses on the overall performance Management System Occupational Health and Safety with attention to the following matters:
Conformance Management System Occupational Health and Safety of the Company's operations and activities. Adequacy of compliance implementation Management System Occupational Health and Safety of the Company K3 Policy.Effectiveness completion of corrective and preventive actions as well as other results aspired. Management Review conducted by the Chairman of the Company and carried out periodically generally carried at least 1 (one) once a year to review the implementation of Safety Management System and Occupational Health Company run correctly.
Things that can be used as a reference in implementing the Management Review, among others:
1. Report emergencies (including events and training / simulation / testing of emergency    
   response
2. Workforce satisfaction survey on the implementation of K3 in the workplace.
3. Statistics incidence of work (including work accidents and occupational diseases).
4. The results of the inspection.
5. The results and recommendations of the monitoring and measurement of performance in the   
    workplace K3.
6. K3 performance contractor.
7. K3 performance suppliers.
8. Information changes in laws and regulations and other requirements relating to the     Implementation of K3 in the workplace




Tinjauan Manajemen fokus terhadap keseluruhan kinerja Sistem Manajemen Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja dengan memperhatikan hal-hal sebagai berikut :
  1. Kesesuaian Sistem Manajemen Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja terhadap operasional dan aktivitas Perusahaan.
  2. Kecukupan pemenuhan penerapan Sistem Manajemen Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja terhadap Kebijakan K3Perusahaan.
  3. Keefektivan penyelesaian tindakan perbaikan dan tindakan pencegahan serta hasil-hasil lain yang dicita-citakan.
Tinjauan Manajemen dilaksanakan oleh Pimpinan Perusahaan dan dilaksanakan secara berkala yang secara umum dilaksanakan minimal 1 (satu) tahun sekali untuk meninjau penerapan Sistem Manajemen Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja Perusahaan berjalan secara tepat.

Hal-hal yang dapat dijadikan acuan dalam melaksanakan Tinjauan Manajemen antara lain :
  1. Laporan keadaan darurat (termasuk kejadian serta pelatihan/simulasi/pengujian tanggap darurat).
  2. Survey kepuasan tenaga kerja terhadap penerapan K3 di tempat kerja.
  3. Statistik insiden kerja (termasuk kecelakaan kerja dan penyakit akibat kerja).
  4. Hasil-hasil inspeksi.
  5. Hasil dan rekomendasi pemantauan dan pengukuran kinerja K3 di tempat kerja.
  6. Kinerja K3 kontraktor.
  7. Kinerja K3 pemasok.
  8. Informasi perubahan peraturan perundang-undangan dan persyaratan lain yang berkaitan dengan penerapan K3 di tempat kerja







Definition Of Management Audit.


Management Audit (Management Audit) is an evaluation of the efficiency and effectiveness of the company's operations. In the context of management audit, management covers all the company's internal operations that must be accountable to the various parties who have a higher authority. Audit management systematically designed to audit the activities, programs are held, or a portion of the entity that could be audited to assess and report on whether the resources and funds have been used efficiently, as well as whether the objectives of the programs and activities that have been planned to be achieved and not violate the provisions and policies established by the company.
 Types of audits carried out to ensure that the operation of the company has been run in accordance with the existing rules and regulations and the use of resources has been carried out effectively and efficiently. In compliance audit (audit compliance), the auditor seeks to obtain and evaluate information to determine whether the financial management, operations, or other activities of an entity in accordance with the criteria, policies, or regulations of the underlying.
In the internal audit (internal audit), auditors conduct independent assessment activities in providing service to the Company. Operational audits (operational auditing), the assessment focuses on the efficiency and effectiveness of operations of an entity. If the definition of operational audit management danaudit connected, it can be said to be both identical. Therefore, management audits can also be called operational audits.
Of the audit described above, the overall audit has similar objectives of assessing how management operates the company, managing its resources, improve the efficiency of the process in achieving corporate objectives consistent.
The objective of the management audit is to identify activities, programs, and activities that still require improvement, so that the recommendations given later can be achieved improvement of the management of the type programs and activities of the company.










Pengertian Audit Manajemen


Audit Manajemen (Management Audit) adalah evaluasi terhadap efisiensi dan efektivitas operasi perusahaan. Dalam konteks audit manajemen, manajemen meliputi seluruh operasi internal perusahaan yang harus dipertanggungjawabkan kepada berbagai pihak yang memiliki wewenang yang lebih tinggi. Audit manajemen dirancang secara sistematis untuk mengaudit aktivitas, program-program yang diselenggarakan, atau sebagian dari entitas yang bisa diaudit untuk menilai dan melaporkan apakah sumber daya dan dana telah digunakan secara efisien, serta apakah tujuan dari program dan aktivitas yang telah direncanakan dapat tercapai dan tidak melanggar ketentuan dan kebijakan yang telah ditetapkan perusahaan.
jenis audit dilakukan untuk memastikan bahwa operasi perusahaan telah berjalan sesuai dengan ketentuan dan peraturan yang ada serta penggunaan sumber daya telah dilakukan secara efektif dan efisien. Pada audit kepatuhan (compliance audit), auditor berusaha mendapatkan dan mengevaluasi informasi untuk menentukan apakah pengelolaan keuangan, operasi, atau aktivitas yang lain dari suatu entitas telah sesuai dengan kriteria, kebijakan, atau regulasi yang mendasarinya.
Dalam audit internal (internal audit), auditor melakukan penilaian secara independen berbagai aktivitas dalam memberikan jasanya kepada perusahaan.
Audit operasional (operational auditing), memfokuskan penilaiannya pada efisiensi dan efektivitas operasi suatu entitas. Apabila pengertian audit operasional danaudit manajemen di hubungkan, maka dapat dikatakan keduanya identik. Oleh karena itu, audit manajemen dapat disebut juga audit operasional.
Dari audit yang dijelaskan di atas, keseluruhan audit memiliki tujuan yang hampir sama yaitu menilai bagaimana manajemen mengoperasikan perusahaan, mengelola sumber daya yang dimiliki, meningkatkan efisiensi proses dalam mencapai tujuan perusahaan secara taat asas.
Tujuan dari audit manajemen adalah untuk mengidentifikasi kegiatan, program, dan aktivitas yang masih memerlukan perbaikan, sehingga dengan rekomendasi yang diberikan nantinya dapat dicapai perbaikan atas pengelolaan berbagai program dan aktivitas pada perusahaan tersebut.






ADVANCED AUDIT


Obtained from the audit findings, auditors summarizing and grouping of the findings in a group of conditions, criteria, cause and effect. The auditor should be able to reveal more and analyze all information related to the audit objectives, and finally a conclusion can be drawn up audit and made recommendations that can be accepted by the audit object.


Step - step audit at this stage include:
1. Collecting additional background information object audit
2. Obtaining evidence - evidence that is relevant, materials, and components
Evidence should relate to the audit criteria: Relevant, Materials, Competent, Self
3. Make a summary of the evidence grouping
The evidence that has been obtained in the audit were summarized and grouped according to the elements of the audit objectives include: criteria, causes, and consequences.
4. Prepare a summary conclusion on the basis of the evidence that has been obtained and identified that the impact of the mismatch between the conditions and criteria for quite important and material.


REPORTING


The final part of the audit process management is reporting audit results. There are two ways of presenting the audit report management, namely:
1. How the presentation that follows the flow of information obtained during the stages of the audit.
2. How the presentation that follows the flow of the presentation of information that focuses on the interests of the users of this audit report.


The report includes the audit conclusions about the elements on the audit objectives and recommendations are given to improve the ease with which the case and follow up plan in applying these recommendations. Follow-up Implementation of follow-up on the recommendations given auditor is a form of management commitment to improving the process and performance of the company over several weaknesses / shortcomings that still occur. The auditor does not have the authority to force and requires management to carry out follow-up in accordance with the recommendations given, but rather put myself as a supervisor on the plan, implementation, and control of actions taken. Recommendations should be the result of discussion and formulation of the joint between the management and the auditors, and also must present an analysis and benefit from the company if the recommendation is implemented, as well as losses that may occur if the recommendations are not implemented because no corrective actions taken by the company.




AUDIT LANJUTAN
Dari temuan audit yang diperoleh, auditor meringkas dan melakukan pengelompokan terhadap temuan tersebut ke dalam kelompok kondisi, kriteria, penyebab dan akibat. Auditor harus mampu mengungkap lebih lanjut dan menganalisis semua informasi yang berkaitan dengan tujuan audit, dan akhirnya dapat disusun suatu simpulan audit dan dibuat rekomendasi yang dapat diterima oleh objek audit.
Langkah – langkah audit pada tahap ini meliputi:
1.      Mengumpulkan tambahan informasi latar belakang objek audit
2.      Memperoleh bukti – bukti yang relevan, material, dan komponen
Bukti harus mempunyai hubungan dengan criteria audit : Relevan, Material, Kompeten, Cukup    
3.      Membuat ringkasan dalam pengelompokan bukti
Bukti-bukti yang telah diperoleh dalam audit kemudian diringkas dan dikelompokkan sesuai dengan elemen tujuan audit meliputi: criteria, penyebab, dan akibat.
4.   Menyusun kesimpulan atas dasar ringkasan bukti yang telah diperoleh dan mengidentifikasi bahwa akibat yang ditimbulkan dari ketidaksesuaian antara kondisi dan kritera cukup penting dan material.


PELAPORAN
Bagian akhir dari proses audit manajemen adalah pelaporan hasil audit. Ada dua cara penyajian laporan audit manajemen, yaitu :
1.      Cara penyajian yang mengikuti arus informasi yang diperoleh selama tahapan-tahapan audit.
2.      Cara penyajian yang mengikuti arus informasi yang menitikberatkan penyajian kepada kepentingan para pengguna laporan hasil audit ini.


Laporan memuat kesimpulan audit tentang elemen-elemen atas tujuan audit dan rekomendasi yang diberikan untuk memperbaiki berbagai kekurangan yang terjadi serta rencana tindak lanjut dalam mengaplikasikan rekomendasi tersebut. Tindak Lanjut Implementasi tindak lanjut atas rekomendasi yang diberikan auditor merupakan bentuk komitmen manajemen dalam meningkatkan proses dan kinerja perusahaan atas beberapa kelemahan/kekurangan yang masih terjadi. Auditor tidak memiliki kewenangan memaksa dan menuntut manajemen untuk melaksanakan tindak lanjut sesuai dengan rekomendasi yang diberikan, tetapi lebih menempatkan diri sebagai supervisor atas rencana, pelaksanaan, dan pengendalian tindak lanjut yang dilakukan. Rekomendasi seharusnya merupakan hasil diskusi dan rumusan bersama antara manajemen dan auditor, dan juga harus menyajikan analisis dan manfaat yang diperoleh perusahaan jika rekomendasi tersebut dilaksanakan, serta kerugian yang mungkin terjadi jika rekomendasi tidak dilaksanakan karena tidak ada tindakan perbaikan yang dilakukan perusahaan.




Auditor's Responsibility in Detecting errors Lack of Materials


Auditor's Responsibility in Detecting errors Material Misstatement
Auditor spend a portion of time spent to plan and execute the audit to detect unintentional mistake that done by the management and employees. Auditor suppress diverse errors caused by errors in the calculation, negligence, misunderstandings and errors penerepan accounting standards, as well as errors in pengelmpokan and explanation.
Auditor's Responsibility to Detect Cheating Materials
Auditing standards do not distinguish the responsibility of management to find errors and fraud. In both these cases, the auditor should be able to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. Auditing standards also recognize that fraud is more difficult to detect because manajaemen or employees involved in the fraud attempted to cover up the fraud. However, the difficulty in detecting not change the auditor's responsibility to plan and execute appropriate audit to detect material misstatements, whether caused by error or cheating

















Tanggung Jawab Auditor dalam Mendeteksi kesalahan Saji Material dan Kecurangan Material


Tanggung Jawab Auditor dalam Mendeteksi kesalahan Saji Material
Auditor menghabiskan porsi waktu terbesarnya untuk melakukan perencanaan dan menjalankan audit untuk mendeteksi kesalahan yang tidak disengaja yang dilakukuan oleh manajemen dan karyawan. Auditor menekan beragam kesalahan yang diakibatkan oleh kesalahan-kesalahan dalam perhitungan, kealpaan , kesalahpahaman dan kesalahan penerepan standar akuntansi, serta kesalahan dalam pengelmpokan dan penjelasan.
Tanggung Jawab Auditor dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan Material
Standar audit tidak membedakan tanggung jawab manajemen untuk menemukan kesalahan dan kecurangan. Pada kedua kasus ini, auditor harus mampu mendapatkan keyakinan yang memadai mengenai apakah laporan keuangan telah bebas dari salah saji material. Standar audit juga mengakui bahwa kecurangan lebih sulit untuk dideteksi karena manajaemen atau karyawan  terlibat dalam kecurangan tersebut berusaha untuk menutup-nutupi kecurangan tersebut. Namun demikian, kesulitan dalam mendeteksi tidak mengubah tanggung jawab auditor untuk merencanakan dan menjalankan audit dengan tepat untuk mendeteksi salah saji material, baik yang disebabkan oleh kesalahan maupun kecurangan.













Guidelines for Management System Audit: Audit Principles


Posted on February 13, 2013 by ariesadhar
Auditing  characterized by reliance on a number of principles that can make effective audit and be a good tool in order to support policy and management control, by providing information that can be used by organizations to improvised performance. Adherence to these principles is a requirement for the provision of audit conclusions that are relevant and appropriate and to make the auditor achieve an appropriate conclusion.
INTEGRITY, the foundation of professionalism
Auditors and personnel who manage the audit program let do his job honestly, diligently and responsibly; monitor and always adhere to all relevant legal requirements; demonstrate competence when doing his job; do the job with good manners, for example, remain valid fair and not biased in any agreement; effect is sensitive to any influences that may exist in any decision-making when the audit.
FAIR, the obligation to carry out correctly and accurately reporting
Audit findings, audit conclusions and audit reports should reflect the audit activities correctly and accurately. Significant barriers that occur during the audit and can not be overcome by the auditor and the auditee should also be reported. Communication should be true, accurate, objective, timely, clear, and complete.
PROFESSIONAL, diligently applies when auditing and in making decisions
The auditor should consider the interests of practice for the implementation of the tasks that have the confidence to it. It's important to work with a professional that can make judgments and decisions in all audit situations.
CONFIDENTIALITY, information security
The auditor should be cautious in the use and protection of information obtained during the task. Audit information should not be used inappropriately by the auditor and the audit client, which can be detrimental to the legitimacy of the auditee. This concept includes the appropriate handling of the sensitive and confidential information.
INDEPENDENT, the basis for audit fairness and objectivity of the audit conclusions
Let auditors independent of the activity being audited if possible, and to act in a way that is free from bias and conflicts of interest. For internal audit, auditors should independently of the operating functions being audited. The auditor should also apply objective to ensure the audit findings and conclusions are drawn based on the audit evidence. For a small organization, it can be tough to be an independent internal auditor fully from the activity being audited, but every effort will need to be deployed to protect the bias and maintain objectivity.


EVIDENCE-BASED APPROACH, rational method to achieve the audit conclusions that are reliable and trustworthy in the context of a systematic audit process
Audit evidence must be verified. In general, the evidence obtained by sampling of the information available in a limited period following the audit of limited resources. Amount corresponding to the sampling process should be done in order to ensure confidence in the audit conclusions












Pedoman Audit Sistem Manajemen: Prinsip Audit


Audit terkarakterisasi dengan ketergantungannya pada sejumlah prinsip yang dapat membuat audit efektif dan menjadi alat yang baik dalam rangka mendukung kebijakan dan control manajemen, dengan menyediakan informasi yang dapat digunakan oleh organisasi untuk improvisasi performa. Ketaatan pada prinsip-prinsip tersebut merupakan persyaratan untuk penyediaan kesimpulan audit yang relevan dan sesuai serta untuk membuat auditor mencapai kesimpulan yang sesuai.
INTEGRITAS, pondasi dari profesionalisme
Auditor dan personel yang mengelola program audit hendaklah melakukan pekerjaannya dengan jujur, rajin, dan penuh tanggung jawab; memantau dan selalu patuh pada segala persyaratan legal yang relevan; memperlihatkan kompetensi ketika melakukan pekerjaannya; melakukan pekerjaannya dengan tata cara yang baik, misalnya tetap berlaku fair dan tidak bias dalam setiap kesepakatan; berlaku sensitive pada setiap pengaruh yang mungkin ada pada setiap pengambilan keputusan ketika audit.
FAIR, kewajiban untuk melakukan pelaporan secara benar dan akurat
Temuan audit, kesimpulan audit, dan laporan audit hendaknya merefleksikan aktivitas audit secara benar dan akurat. Hambatan signifikan yang terjadi selama audit dan tidak dapat diatasi oleh auditor dan auditee juga harus dilaporkan. Komunikasi hendaknya benar, akurat, objektif, tepat waktu, jelas, dan tuntas.
PROFESIONAL, berlaku tekun ketika audit dan dalam melakukan pengambilan keputusan
Auditor hendaknya berlatih untuk memperhatikan kepentingan tugas yang dilaksanakannya dengan memiliki keyakinan untuk itu. Sangat penting untuk bekerja dengan profesional sehingga dapat membuat pertimbangan dan keputusan di dalam semua situasi audit.
KERAHASIAAN, keamanan informasi
Auditor hendaknya bertindak hati-hati dalam penggunaan dan proteksi informasi yang didapatkan selama tugasnya. Informasi audit hendaknya tidak digunakan secara tidak sesuai oleh auditor maupun klien audit, yang dapat merugikan legitimasi auditee. Konsep ini mencakup penanganan yang sesuai terhadap informasi yang sensitif dan rahasia.
INDEPENDEN, basis untuk keadilan audit dan objektivitas kesimpulan audit
Auditor hendaklah independen dari aktivitas yang diaudit jika memungkinkan, dan bertindak sedemikian rupa sehingga bebas dari bias dan konflik kepentingan. Untuk internal audit, auditor hendaknya independen dari fungsi operasi yang diaudit. Auditor juga harus berlaku objektif untuk memastikan temuan audit dan kesimpulan diambil berdasarkan bukti audit. Untuk organisasi yang kecil, bisa jadi sulit untuk auditor internal bisa independen sepenuhnya dari aktivitas yang diaudit, akan tetapi setiap usaha perlu dikerahkan untuk melindungi bias dan mempertahankan objektivitas.
PENDEKATAN BERBASIS BUKTI, metode rasional untuk mencapai kesimpulan audit yang handal dan dapat dipercaya dalam rangka proses audit yang sistematis
Bukti audit harus dapat diverifikasi. Secara umum bukti diperoleh berdasarkan pengambilan sampel terhadap informasi yang tersedia dalam periode audit yang terbatas berikut sumber daya yang terbatas pula. Jumlah yang sesuai untuk proses pengambilan sampel hendaknya dilakukan guna menjamin keyakinan terhadap kesimpulan audit.
(diterjemahkan dari ISO 19011: 2011)


























Kamis, 26 Maret 2015

bahasa inggris 2

 Nama  : Sarah Mutiara Dewi
Kelas    : 1EA01
NPM    : 1A214034
Lion Air management audited
            Critics have been accused the government of being too lenient toward the country’s largest budget airline, Lion Air, after extensive flight delays disrupted the travel of more than 3,000 passengers last week, immediately alluding to the “influence” of its controlling owner, Rusdi Kirana, who is a member of the President’s advisory council.
            The civil aviation authority announced on Monday it had strongly reprimanded Lion Air, banned it from applying for new service route permits, set up a special team to audit the management of the airline and seen to it that the company fully compensated affected passengers in line with civil aviation law.
            However, some analysts and consumer organizations have been demanded stronger action, urging the government to suspend some of Lion Air’s service routes as a penalty for its utterly poor performance because last week’s debacle was the second massive flight disruption since September 2013.
            But we think suspending several of Lion Air’s service routes is not a good solution. Such a drastic measure would instead cause a new major disruption of domestic flight services across the country as the low-cost airline now controls almost 40 percent of domestic services.
            A thorough audit of the company’s system of management is more urgent and important to find out why the grounding of just three airplanes for mechanical problems set off such a significant disruption of its services from Jakarta’s international airport.
            Even though the impact of the flight delays was exacerbated by the fact that the disruption took place during Chinese New Year, the impact would not have been so massive had the company properly executed its standard operating procedures for crisis management.
            Every airline is required to have at hand step-by-step standard operating procedures (SOP) for two kinds of crisis management caused respectively by massive flight delays and plane crashes. Since the flight delays were not caused by external factors, such as weather conditions or traffic gridlock within the airport, the pandemonium caused by angry passengers who ransacked and damaged equipment in the terminal should be blamed on Lion Air’s poor management.
            Early indications showed that Lion Air had been too aggressive in expanding its services without the support of an adequate number of airplanes and the civil aviation authority also should be blamed for having allowed the airline to ply so many routes without thoroughly checking its fleet capacity.
            The volume of domestic air services has been expanding by more than 20 percent a year over the past decade and more cities across the vast archipelago have become interconnected, both as a result of the role of low-cost airlines such as Lion Air.
            But the government should improve its supervision of the airline industry and an audit of Lion Air’s system of management will also help the civil aviation authority to find out what is lacking in its oversight mechanism.